DIY: An even simpler way to repair a cracked luff of a (Neil Pryde RS) race or slalom sail.

 

 

There'll not be much explaining here, as a most of procedures are similar to the first and more elaborate cracked-luff-repairing attempt. The main differences - with the aim of trying to cut down the time consumption and costs - are that I'll ...

 

- be a little more careful not to cut open too much of the sleeve (a time consumption consideration),

 

- be using contact cement/glue instead of the more professional double sided tape (a cost reduction consideration),

 

- be cutting strips from ordinary fabrics instead of using the more professional sail tape (a cost reduction consideration),

 

- be preparing for ALL the stitching by burning stitching holes with a soldering iron (a time consumption consideration).

 

 

 

1.

 

Two ways to cut open the sleeve to get access to the damaged luff. The "knife-method" is the faster way to cut the stitches - but be careful not to damage the fabrics.

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

 

2.

 

The sleeve's cut open, and there's access to the damaged luff area.

 

 

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

 

3.

 

No surprises here - a classical/typical Neil Pryde RS damaged luff as we've seen so damn often.

 

 

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

4.

 

Excuse me for a little deviation: Which glue is the best?

A little (extremely non-scientific) test indicates that the best contact cement/glue is the Nautix type (for boom grips). Somewhat behind in efficiency (especially after being submerged in water, as here) is the neoprene glue (meant for wet suits), that's a little better than ordinary (cheap) contact cement/glue.

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

5.

 

The cracks have been "stabilized" in place by gluing some strips of fabric (from a trashed sail) on either sides. In this instance the glue is Nautix contact glue.

 

 

 

 

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

6.

 

A template is made from some monofilm, and a couple of patches (one for either side of the luff) are copied from the template.

 

 

 

 

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

7.

 

The patches have been bonded to either side of the luff, the stitching holes have been burned by means of a soldering iron, and the stitching work has been done.

Now it's time for closing the sleeve again.

 

 

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

8.

 

Preparing for bonding the sleeve in place (this time with neoprene glue).

 

 

 

 

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

9.

 

As the sleeve in this instance has been opened before (guess why!), I opted to strengthen the area by gluing a strip of fabric on either side of the sail. As usual the stitching holes were made by a soldering iron.

Here you see the repaired area after finishing the stitching job.

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

10.

 

The sail's ready for having the battens inserted again.

 

It's probably most usual that a Neil Pryde RS sail gets trashed a looong time before having visited a doctor this often. On the bright side: At least there're now 3 spots that probably don't have to be repaired again.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

11.

 

Time consumption this time amounted to some 2½ hours. This is something around half the time of the first attempt - but of course this time the damages were a little less extensive, as the cracks hadn't spread to the (window-) panel behind the sleeve.

 

Not using a (special) sewing machine, by far the most time consumption work is the stitching. To ease this process I've chosen to "pre-hole" the fabrics by means of a soldering iron - but perhaps a so-called "Hand-Stitching Device" can be a shortcut to even faster cracked-luff repairs? There're lots of the devices around - the one you can see above is found at  http://www3.westfalia.net/shops/household/handicrafts/

and costs $10.

 

Click the picture to enlarge.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It will probably take a while before actually trying out this sail, and so there'll be no hint as to the durability of the operated area in the near future. But I don't see why the repair shouldn't be as strong as the first (successful) attempt.